Thursday, July 9, 2015

Capital Letters - Keynote 3 - Bernard Beckett

Have just read his latest book, Lullaby, so interested in hearing this. 

Follows on nicely from the 'Connected Curriculum' workshop this morning! 

Beckett challenged us with quite a few questions - Why do we  teach our subject? What is our idea of the specialisation of English? 

His humour resonated with many - and there were lots of nodding heads with the very funny comments on the list of jobs we do - and how we  prioritise them! 
Marking the roll - in the first 10mins - most probably not ? Priority list depends on how scary the end user is!!

Two reasons we shouldn't have for why we teach : 
The agendas of people above us - govern what we do! 
He looked at the  task of getting good grades - how this filters down from BOT to Principal to HOF to staff  - and the impact of this on Level 2.
The myth that 85% Level 2 will make a better society - our economy is structured around casual part-time labour.
This is not why we teach. What you respond to 'what have contributed to these kids lives?' 
If this is what you think - shift your thinking! 
AND 
Effective pedagogy and modern thinking drive teaching - but modern educational research is poor! Most educational researchers are not strong Mathematicians - as shown by Hattie's research. Always ask 'who gains from this research?'

Not everything important is measurable (Einstein)
He had very little positive to say about educational research - mostly educational research is on narrow measurable fields - reading, literacy. 
Hawthorn effect - that any change creates improvement-and 'cos kids are growing then they are learning - so therefrom there will naturally be growth and development. Biggest shift at primary level - naturally less shift at top secondary level. 

Variance in teacher quality - will show teacher quality is variable - not what you would do to change this.

As an economist he was pretty scathing of the push for IT integration - Look at IT providers - if the big companies can show that the technology  improves educational outcomes, then 700,000 kids will want it!! What can you not buy in your school because the money's been spent on IT.

So why do we go there? To the English class each day? 
You know the lesson that works - the discussion that had impact  -  in the classroom - kids are trying out their lives. 

Nice thought re defining the power of literature and its place in our world 'Literature is the moment when we know we're not alone.' 



Blended Courses - Expanding English - Workshop 3, Capital LettersConference (to be edited)

Really looking forward to this presentation, as we are looking to connect our curriculum more next year. As a classicist and an art historian, this really appeals to me. 

Wellington High 'students very comfortable in their own liberalism!' 

Rationale: from the NZC - coherence within and across learning areas - thus begins with sone pockets of the junior school before heading into the senior school.

Aims: not all students are into 'literature' like we are!! ; some of our skills are transferable

Concerns: compromise required but richness gained - well blended courses make what is being learned explicit 
              : fear that numbers might be reduced - but the opposite has happened - blended and pure English classes 
              : too many credits offered - internals double up for assessment 

COURSE 1 - Painted word - English and Art History- L2 and 3
- planning and co teaching 
- inquiry 
- content rich 
- students as teachers 
- lots of choice - assessment programmes student selected
- Art History and English studs offered 
- applies analytical skills in a different context 
- art and literature a natural connection - often part of a movement 
- subject and theme / context / composition and structure / 
- Art History internals can contribute to writing portfolio; seminars on Art History - need to be very explicit about what assessment criteria are - that's the trick - tasks are quite long and complex 

- Neo-Historicism approach - how do the literature and art represent the social context of the time 

- use texts to enhance understanding of context - Moulin Rouge / Marie Antoinette 
- use texts to understand  the role of art in society - Lives of others 

Types of writing 
- ekphrastic poetry
- reviews


COURSE 2 - English for Scientists (for many a 6th subject)
The Science of poetry, the poetry of Science - both depend on metaphor 
Science communication is a growing field - including Science writing degree at Vic Uni 

- lost many students in Yr 13 
- 2hrs a week -English uses Science ideas and Science texts - 1/2 
- students familiar with process
- course relies on flexibility, indivualised conference, lots of conferencing 

- choice of texts play to scientific interests - personal choice 
- opportunity for connections, language, reading of visual texts, language of Science

Robert Boyle - father of Science writing 
I must not step into too spruce a style for serious matters; and yet I approve not the dull insipid way of writing practised by many chemists.

 - writing again plays to student strengths - articles/ reports/ personal pieces 

The year begins with researching an 'old' scientists - pre 19th century - they then write the article based on this - has created a huge range of knowledge.

COURSE - 3 English for Classicists
- 4hrs a week
- begins at Yr 11- mostly Classical Studies contexts with English skills
- combined assessment opportunities - time to figure out 
- cross over of skills and content for both AS
- heavily internal - that's what the kids want - student want the course to carry on

 Representation of Heroes across time 
- Odyssey 
- Greek vase painting - 'read' the vases to keep the stories alive - the narrative structure 
- Modern US film (post 9/11) Heroic Myth - Troy/ Clash of the Titans  

- skills - close reading, connections, responding to literature, analysing social values, comparing ideas and perspectives

English with Philosophy (next project) 
- linked with religious studies standards 
- philosophical questions that are relevant for students today 
- the human condition 


Great Science jokes!!

When I heard that oxygen and magnesium had hooked up, I was like OMg!!!

Fabulous presentation - Caitlin, Trudy, Jane - thanks so much! 




Wednesday, July 8, 2015

Capital Letters - Karen Melhuish - Keynote #2

I was looking forward to Karen's presentation - she is always entertaining, engaging and usually delivers a thought provoking presentation! 

I loved the opening hook- best new words of 2015 - 
VAPE - Oxford word of 2015  - particularly of interest as we have had a rise of e-cigarettes at school this year. 



However more interesting was what the Kids chose-  # 
This pretty much sums up what is happening to language - symbols and emoticons are the rage. 

Karen challenged us to question - Why are we, as English teachers, still relevant?How do we connect with our learners? 

So much is happening world wide - leads us to pose questions - especially around what does it mean to be a citizen today? The cost of technology had been a main driver of education worldwide. 

This creates its own challenges around cybersafety - scams, bullying - we have the technology in our hands but have still not learnt how to manage that technology safely and respectfully - this is major challenge for schools and teachers. 

Digital technology enables every person to have a chance to speak out! The rise of citizen journalism - anyone can report anything, anytime, anywhere. This is  empowering and emancipating - a phone, a camera - anywhere anytime!

Karen introduced the idea of the  metaphor of the 'commons' - in days gone by a public land - shared. She challenged us to think about the Internet as a 'commons' a place that is shared and respected so that we can all benefit from their use.

A nice quote from Kerry Facer - the future is an ongoing process 'in which we can intervene'.

Ministry of Education - acknowlege the following 
- change in the nature of work
- change in how knowledge is viewed
How do we manage this? 

For years we have been trying to get kids to contort themselves into education systems that does not fit them!!
There is an increasing call to do things differently!  Just look at the data around the well being of our students at school - this is increasingly worrying - ERO's recent report acknowledges this. 

Cells and Bells - where are the cells and bells in English?
- single text choice
- teach by standard
- streaming 
- no connection to other areas 
- limited reference to best practice 
.....

7 principles of learning - http://www.oecd.org/edu/ceri/50300814.pdf


All of these lead to the 'unbundling' of thinking. 
How do we unbundle structure? content? 

How different is English from when you you at school?
They should be looking different - and if they are not, what do you need to change? 

We may not always agree with what creators of texts say, but we need to be able to assist them to be able say what they want in a way that makes a contribution in a meaningful way. 

Edutronic - UK English Dept website - 

What does making meaning look like in 2015 and beyond? How do we make Emhlish relevant ? 
-how do we navigate the personal and digital world?
- how go we connect the dots between what we do in English and what the kids do in their world? 
- what does literature look like ? 
- what does poetry look like? 
- can game be literature? (Gone Home)

What does creating meaning look like 2015 and beyond? 
What should English look like? 

Find out what will connect the students to our programmes??
Our can we connect ourselves? 
Make your visible learning!

Take away point - if it's good enough for the kids in our class them it's good enough to share !! Great 'mantra' for moving forward.

Kia kaha Karen 










Capital Letters - Glenn Colquhoun - opening keynote - Myths and Legends Of the Ancient Pakeha


For some unknown reason, Glenn Colquhoun began his session by apologising for his singing voice - I have no idea why?? He has beautiful voice. 

Glenn's keynote was on the art of oral poetry in NZ - or songs for Pakeha to sing at powhiri! 

He started with songs and poetry that focussed on love across cultures - using Burns and Maori voices.

Ideas such as - an oral poem does not exist on the page - but in thin air and the spaces in between - and that we need to fill those spaces! 

Our country had two poetries - one  written in English the other sung and danced in Maori - very little conversation between  the two. His journey has led him to connect the two. The conference at Takapuna  forced him to confront these two worlds. 

What would pakeha oral poetry sound like - would they match the power of Te Reo?

He used a lovely phrase - Maori have 'Hymn book in the head' 

Historically writing allowed the poem to become more cerebral and more studied - this has left the poem 'spiky irrelevant and intimidating at times!

We tend to forget that melody changes the way the poem is understood - but is very powerful. 
Value of public performance changes the meaning and creates part of a conversation with an entire society. 

Glenn spoke about how he mined 'pakeha history' for the stories  of early NZers to form the oral poetry-songs of Colquhoun - Budby, Kendall, von Tempsky, Price, Diffenbach, and his own great great great great Grandmother- hymns,shanty, sonnets, ballads and work songs. 

While writing/composing these he discovered that stories of pakeha are as powerful and moving as those of other cultures. Fabulous link between the painted image and the spoken word - each piece of poetry linked to an early NZ image. 

Broken and incomplete subjects are more powerful than those that are bright and shiny. 

Again I have  no idea why he apologised for his singing - his keynote was mesmerising.

Kia kaha 















Friday, July 3, 2015

Connected Curriculum and Innovative Practice - TOD with Di Cavallo

This was our third 'mini conference' TOD and it was great to have Di Cavallo from HPSS as our keynote speaker, sharing their journey and their work around learning  design. It was a thought provoking and entertaining sharing of ideas. 



Di started with what underpins us as teachers - Moral purpose - and reminded us of the ideas of C Beeby (1939)  that 'every person regardless of background or ability had a right to an education of a type for which they were best suited'
Parents send us 'their best' and we have to do 'our best' with them and for them. 

Technology has changed - the way the  classroom operates in many cases have not. We should be asking ourselves the question  - What do children need today?

Connect the dots obviously the language of HPSS cannot be directly transplanted to here at RHS, but the ideas  Di presented resonated with many of us- 

- we think kids are 'au fait' with all things 'tech' but they are in face naive pa out many things. 
- however things such as augmented  reality is here now - just like we expected the tape deck back in the 1989s, what do they expect today?

HPSS - learning centres around some key words and ideas -.
Define discover and dream
How could we empower our learners for their future ?
A new model not just what we've always done!

Loved this phrase - the most expensive words in education - 'we've always done it this way!!' 
The Big Projects were of interest to those of us who are looking to connect curriculum areas for authentic and engaging learning. At HPSS Big Projects have to be 'bigger than ourselves'
Di shared a film made by 3 Yr 9'students based around a local concern - the endangered plant - epilobium.  You can view the piece here - http://www.theoutlookforsomeday.net/films/2014/038/

The kids worlds have become on demand - TV  will be on demand - what and when they want to view it.  We need to hook into - 'Just in time as opposed to just in case' learning.m

This statement was for some,  is a hard pill to swallow - the fact that we've built empires - called curriculum areas!  One of the reasons that change is easier for primary teachers is that they have never had the silos!! 

Personalised learning - HPSS staff are committed to truly  personalised, student centred learning - focussed  student voice and student choice. 

Other key ideas include making use of Powerful partnerships. Connected learning and connecting the curriculum are key. Everyone has an understanding of what everyone's curriculum looks like. 
Connecting curriculum - what is the intent of the curriculum ? What are the common threads, language and concepts across the 8 areas.  Teachers have to look  outside of their bubble. 

Highlighting Deep challenge and inquiry in order to create  Critical thinkers and inquiring minds underpins planning. The language and hierarchy of verbs goes is central to lesson and unit planning. 

Timetable focus at HPSS - an iterative timetable it seems! 
Learning Hub / Coach - 4hrs a week - home group 
Need to change the pastoral model 
My Time - a continuum depending on self management skills - might be directed to literacy and numeracy - or totally self directed 
Learning Projects - real life deadlines and real clients 
Learning Modules - what we could call subject time

Students expected to be like staff and check in before the start of the day - before Learning Hub time - self management an expectation.  Students sharing their learning story is also a given. 

Collaborative planning and co teaching - different types of co teaching.

How do we make learning explicit and relevant to the kids. 

How hard is it for kids to make the connections?

The plate of broccoli analogy. The broccoli is the stuff we have to have. The chocolate dresses it up as a plate of broccoli is not that great by itself. 

Enjoy the nutrition in the lesson not just the way it's been dressed up?
What skill or conceptual understanding has been developed ?

Be a learning designer - we design learning every day - what experiences do you want kids to have ? 

Replace - strands with contexts  - in order to get the threshold concepts
All teachers have been challenged to look at all other areas and see what is the key thing in each area.
Huge overlaps.

At HPSS there are 8 - for the foundation years of 9 and 10.



Be agile - key to planning 
Deliver the learning design - in x curricular groups - who has what concepts that will fit?

The value of transferable tool - such as paragraph writing - consistency of tools across the school. 

Language is power - look at the essence of your learning area. 
Common language across the school. 
Natural collation of words - from the NZC - learning verbs the keywords - ordered in hierarchy of words - these frame learning objectives of the unit and the lesson.

Enhance natural connections -
How can Maths fit with Art? 
Where do we go to in Yr 13??
Help the students make links across the learning areas. 

Allow bizarre connections  to flow.

And through all of this we saw NOT ONE PHOTO OF A BUILDING 
BECAUSE -The most important open space is your mind!  

Leading by design
What is really important in our Faculty or team? 
What are the values? How do we live them everyday? 

Shared vision
Secured accountability
Self review
Process for embedding vision in learning practice 

So many ideas, so little time. Hard to believe this all came from an hour.......

Other workshops were presented by RHS staff and facilitators from Te Toi Tupu. I attended two different ones. Kerry Sullivan's session on Zaption was well received, as was the Flipped classroom sessions facilitated by Sarah and Jess from Te Toi Tupu. 
One of the key messages around flipped classrooms was to consider 
 - What content can be recorded for students to see again? 
 - And that a bad lesson, will not become a better lesson just by putting it on a video! 



Tired team at the end of the day - I hope Di had  a voice left for the weekend !!





Friday, June 26, 2015

CADAP - Building capacity of Middle Leaders

Christina Thornley - Principal's Advisor, Teachers' Council - was the keynote speaker at the term's CADAP professional learning session. She presented a seminar on effective and valuable appraisal processes. What was encouraging was that our school's PPL (partnership for professional learning) inquiry and appraisal cycle, does a lot of what Christine says, 'is good practice'. 

The aims of the day were to create a  'Better understanding through the professional workshops of what appraisal should be - valuable and manageable ' and to reinforce that 'buildng the capacity of Middle Leaders is a key job of SL - and that includes a clear vision and focus for professional learning and appraisal.' 

Any appraisal system/process should have - 
Purpose 
Value
Intention

These need a conceptual framework and a scaffold - in order to have a robust appraisal framework. The 'appraisal conceptual framework' devised for this.
Our teacher inquiry model is our framework šŸ˜

There is a need  to sit the Professional Standards next to Registered Teacher Criteria - 

Essential to have a process for the 'difficult conversations' - open to learning conversations 
- respectful
- focussed on the issue 
- sense of agreement to move forward 

Responsibility - have a clear and transparent model for staff - at all levels - who is responsible for what in the process - everyone has the right to grow - growth framing. Multi layered purpose to the system. Through the inquiry  system, evidence for appraisal is created, inquiry for the teacher NOT just for appraisal.
I think this is something that we have not 'nailed' yet - enabling teachers to see and understand that inquiry is about continually reflecting on practice in order to improve, not to generate data and evidence! 

What is good when we look for evidence for the RTC? Teachers take an inquiry mindset to our teaching already - we have just not formalised or organised this into an inquiry cycle. How are our students doing and how do we know - is what we as teachers do - it's what keeps us going! This is the evaluative capability. 

Akonga - is any learner - teachers in schools are the akonga of middle leaders, middle leaders are the akonga of the senior leadership team.....

What does good look like? 
Mediocrity is not enough - good is the baseline hurdle!! This is the bottom line. If you cannot get over the hurdle, then it needs to be addressed. Teachers can be in different places for each criteria - this is what sets the goal.

 Tātaiako a lens to look through the criteria - not a separate set. 
Knowing what good looks like us really important - especially for Middle Leaders ? Need to develop a rubric for showing what good likes. These may look different in different settings.
We need to define what effective practice look like in 'our place' - has not been done for awhile. 

Defining what good looks like through - PEP, KEP, Tātaiako, NCEA - where does this place us nationwide.  This may look different across different roles in the school - faculties, pastoral etc.

Organising evidence - holistic approaches to evidence enable teachers to link planning to outcomes for students - a central organising construct eg 

- RTC
Tātaiako competencies
- goal for inquiry 

A holistic approach needs the teachers to have the criteria in the forefront of teachers thinking 

Good practice would come a range of sources. Probably 2 observations and discussions around this. My actions are not just based on my own view - Tātaiako affirms this -we are only one voice.

Appraisal evidence should come from the  'harvest of everyday practice' !! So much! Choose something that stands out  - something that matters in an inquiry! 

Might have lots of evidence, but does that reflect what 'good looks like' ?

# Gathering evidence is not the PURPOSE of an inquiry, it's what falls out of an inquiry! - a key point to remember. 

Questions and thoughts - questions to ask ourselves back at school 
What's working well in our model? 
What professional learning are we doing for Middle Leaders  around this process? 
What are the pros and cons of our current model?









 








Sunday, June 7, 2015

Just reading - Creative Schools by Sir Ken

Reading books by leading educational researcher and thinker Sir Ken Robinson, is almost as good as listening to him speak in the flesh! He writes as he talks - in a voice that is engaging, passionate, humorous. A voice  which offers the  definitive reasons for why there needs to be a revolution in the way we deliver education - NOW.

I'm halfway through his latest tome - Creative Schools - revolutionizing education from the ground up - but it would be fair to say, that in me he's preaching to the converted, but I wanted to share two sections here.

'Opportunities for change exist within every school, even where the emphasis on high stakes testing has become extreme. Schools often do things simply because they've always done them. The culture of any school includes the habits and systems that the people in it act out every day. Many of these habits are voluntary rather than mandated - teaching by age groups for example, or making every period the same length, using belss to signal the beginning and end of periods, having every students facing the same direction with the teacher at the front of the room, teaching math only in math class and history in history class and so on.' pg57

My current school is grappling with a number of these 'habits and systems'  (which as Sir Ken, so rightly states are voluntary) right now, as we try to work through a process of change management - curriculum, pedagogy and spaces are on the agenda. We are lucky enough to have contact with NZ educators  who are leading the revolution in their schools - because it's what is best for the learners. I hope we are brave enough to learn from them.

Sir Ken's teachings around 'personalisation' are straightforward - in every aspect of life, personalisation is apparent. But as he says  -

'..it has yet to take root in education. This is ironic, because it is in education that personalisation is most urgently needed. So what does that mean? It means: 

  • recognising that intelligence is diverse and multifaceted
  • enabling students to pursue their particular interests and strengths
  • adapting a schedule to different rates at which students learn
  • assessing students in ways that support their personal progress and achievement ' pg 83


I believe we need to be brave and follow what we know is our moral purpose - and make the revolution happen.